Joseph Rakofsky graduated law school in 2009 and
Juris Doctorate
First Year Students
Full Time Students (12 – 16 credits) $20,475.00 per semester
Part Time Students (8 – 11 credits) $15,330.00 per semester
Part Time Students (8 – 11 credits) $15,330.00 per semester
Second Year Students
Full Time Students (12 – 16 credits) $20,055.00 per semester
Part Time Students (8 – 11 credits) $15,120.00 per semester
Part Time Students (8 – 11 credits) $15,120.00 per semester
Third Year Students
Full Time Students (12 – 16 credits) $19,645.00 per semester
Part Time Students (8 – 11 credits) $14,915.00 per semester
The school charges students more than $40,000 per year. How can a school that bad have the audacity to charge so much? Because there is no accountability and people are stupid enough to pay. Unfortunately, there are too many people out there willing to take out an absurd amount of loans to pay it and banks irresponsibly lend it out to people with no prospect of paying it back. So the cycle continues. Idiots like Joseph Rakofsky get to call themselves lawyers.Part Time Students (8 – 11 credits) $14,915.00 per semester
Now, what gets lost in all this, as I've written about before, is that Joseph Rakofsky doesn't suffer (though, he should be sanctioned). No, only the defendant and the victim's family suffer. If he's innocent, the defendant doesn't get a fair trial. If he's guilty, the victim's family doesn't get justice. The judge should be applauded for taking charge and dismissing the attorney. Joseph Rakofsky took on a case that he was not competent to handle. The legal standard for effective representation is frighteningly low, so a judge doesn’t declare a mistrial based on incompetency of counsel unless the lawyer is really, really, really incompetent. The judge said that Rakofsky’s performance was “below what any reasonable person would expect in a murder trial.” But think about that for a second. Why just a murder trial? Shouldn't clients in ANY criminal case receive the same level of representation. Anyone convicted of a crime - whether it's excessive speeding, DUI, or murder - will have a criminal record that can prevent them from getting jobs, entering federal buildings, getting security clearance, or just from having a good reputation. If Rakofsky should not have been trying murders, he should not have been trying anything without adult supervision.
How does the legal community allow something like this to happen? Would a first year resident operate on someone alone? No, because that's how people die. Young attorneys are the same. Here we have a man, on trial for his life, facing life in prison, whose attorney doesn't even have a basic competency in criminal procedure. Where would he learn that procedure? Well, law school might be a good start. And what was Rakofsky's response? When asked about his website's claims that he has worked on "murder, embezzlement and conspiracy cases," Rakofsky simply replied, "when I say I've worked on those cases, that doesn't mean I've worked on those cases on my own . . . I was working with other lawyers, interning and stuff." But Joseph Rakofsky isn’t special. Thousands of lawyers - every day - claim attributes that they don’t have and take cases they are not ready to take. Nothing he did made him any more blameworthy than any of those lawyers: lawyers whose need to make a buck overcomes their judgment and ethics.
It's embarrassing that this stuff happens every day. But how did Rakofsky respond? He bragged (click to enlarge). I got this image from Military Underdog:
No comments:
Post a Comment